I will not outright say Blade of the Ruined King will be removed, but in the instance it is or if it receives a nerf or change which will once again place it into a state of mediocrity, the dynamic of Lucian as a power pick or the strength of duel reliant champions may shift as well.
This is the nature of itemization and the need for change in its essence. As items, champions, and the game as a whole change over time and the course of League of Legends shifts with each season, we have seen some of our favorite champions go in and out of play as builds and playstyles are opened up to them. When the Devourer item was originally released, champions who had a difficult time adjusting to new changes, like Shyvana, Master Yi, and even Jax for a time, found themselves among the top picks as a whole.
This is a pattern that we have seen repeat numerous times, with some champions who saw almost no play or had difficulty justifying as a pick in most matches suddenly blooming or overtaking the game as a whole.
As the game continues to evolve and we see items we love to play with, or items we rarely see outside of a few niche picks, change and eventually find their way out of the game we will continue to adapt and embrace what we are given.
For as easy as it is to say "This and this item was overpowered" or "Riot should bring back my favorite item" R. P Sword of the Divine , it boils down to the concept of certain things must change with the times, and because of this philosophy, we will have to say goodbye to items and builds that we love to play to make room for new content, and a healthier base to jump into as the game develops.
While we will always remember the items content that we loved, as players we will adapt and hold on to the memories as League of Legends moves forward. Like our content? Support us by getting our merchandise in our shop. It's a common item for junglers and DPS champs with decent to high attack speed.
This obviously is a great item for DPS champions. It increases attack speed, damage, and gives you a little bit of armor to survive a bit better.
Indeed, this is an item you'll be seeing a lot - but in what situations? First, we need to clear up some basics of the item. That means that it only applies once, no matter how many copies of it you've purchased. The second thing you should know is that the Bloodrazor deals magic damage, meaning that it is affected by magic resist and not armor, and is also affected by magic penetration.
Pretty much common sense, right? We're good players! Here we get into the more advanced nuances of the item. Now the first thing that a lot of people say when dealing with Madred's Bloodrazor is "It's a great item for taking down tanks with a lot of health.
The most common argument I've seen against this - and let me tell you, this is aggravating - "You're wrong! If I attack a champion with health, I'm doing 4 damage per hit. I take him down in 20 hits.
But if I attack a champion with health, I'm doing damage per hit, and I still only take him down in 20 hits! Madred's doesn't let you kill tanks at all! So what's the right answer? There's a method that you have to go around in order to calculate exactly how good Bloodrazor is in a certain scenario.
You also have to consider its cost per gold effectiveness. Another part of the argument is that you can save money and get a better item, like The Bloodthirster. Jul 20th, Distinguished Like the Hexdrinker, though, they'd probably reduce the components to build Malady down to two, removing one of the daggers, lowering the price, and reducing the stats.
Dec 12th, This is roughly twice the damage on Wit's End, not triple it. Your value for the Bloodrazor, then, would come out to , which is pretty close to its cost. I don't think this is the right way to try to value the Bloodrazor, though. Finding the value for the on-hit magic damage it deals is difficult, but for the sake of argument I'm going to use the Using these numbers, the Bloodrazor only needs to deal about Even using a value-per-damage as low as 20 gold, the Bloodrazor is cost-efficient before enemy HP.
The main thing I'm trying to show with these calculations is that the Bloodrazor remains a cost-efficient item even against squishy targets, and becomes obviously god-like against those who stack HP. It's an excellent mid- to late-game choice on champions that don't build much damage and can make good use of the attack speed it provides, such as Udyr and Warwick. My posts may be long. If this bothers you, don't read them.
Jun 6th, Esteemed You get an extra bonus for finishing an item. User Info: Bulbopwn. Low elo detected. User Info: Dartkun. Bulbopwn posted User Info: sneaks User Info: Reikken. Tank WW is the way to go. Tank WW is the way to go Because we are talking about real builds and strategies. When I said no one builds WW for damage I meant in an actual game.
User Info: ghostly Lol at people who think it would be some end all be all weapon. It's expensive and any champ who tried stacking them would be squishier than Vayne. Mres would still laugh at it even if they had two or three, tanks would just CC them and lol when they got melted like the glass canon they are.
0コメント